Log In

Username:

Password:

   Stay logged in?

Forgot Password?

User Status

 

Attention

 

Recover Password

Username or Email:

Loading...
Change Image
Enter the code in the photo at left:

Before We Continue...

Are you absolutely sure you want
to delete this message?

Premium Membership

Upgrade to
Premium Membership!

Renew Your
Premium Membership!

$99
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR

Premium Membership includes the following benefits:

Don't let your Premium Membership expire, or you'll miss out on:

  • Exclusive access to over 1,620 video demonstrations of patterns in the full bronze, silver and gold levels.
  • Access to all previous variations of the week, including full video instruction of man's and lady's parts.
  • Over twice as many videos as basic membership.
  • A completely ad-free experience!

 

Sponsored Ad

+ View Older Messages

Re: Waltz: Whisk to Wing
Posted by Serendipidy
3/9/2008  8:55:00 AM
John.Usually a Wing follows a Whisk. It can also follow a Open Impetus. Where does an Open Impetus normally finish. It finishes diagnal to the centre. The first step for the man is in Promenade and is straight. So what should the ladies step be. What is the lady doing. It is very much like a man's Curving Three Step except at the end on the third step she creates a shape. The Rise and Fall is important for the lady.Commence to rise at the end of one. Continue to rise on two. up on three. lower at the end of three. It is much nicer and gives a better shape if the lady keeps her head to her left looking over the back and giving her a long line. Resisting the temptation to look to her front. Good Luck
Re: Waltz: Whisk to Wing
Posted by dheun
3/9/2008  9:01:00 AM
I held back on replying to this post because your original definition also didn't make sense to me. The way Jonathan describes the sequence is exactly how I thought the steps should proceed. I was having a hard time figuring how the lady could make such a turn off the Whisk, especially when you move into a promenade position.
Thanks for the question, and the explanation. I like that term, Running Wing, too. I now can call it something.
Over the years, I have been taught a lot of steps by instructors who don't spend a lot of time explaining what certain sequences in a variation are called. They've been more interested in getting the footwork and balance correct.
I've probably learned more in that regard by reading the descriptions of the variations explained in text and video on this site.
Re: Waltz: Whisk to Wing
Posted by johnbrennan
3/9/2008  9:49:00 AM
Thanks Serendipidy for the alignment, information on Wing after Open Impetus and Rise and Fall. All very useful points. Thanks Dheun for your input. I would like to say, however, coincidentally or not, but I actually saw what you mentioned.

Earlier today I saw a video of a guy dancing with a lady in blue, and even though it was not what I was endeavouring to do, he swung that lady off a whisk in promenade into a 360. Today dheun you coincidentally, mentioned exactly what I saw. "I was having a hard time figuring how the lady could make such a turn off the Whisk, especially when you move into a promenade position." See link where it says WALTZ
http://www.wretch.cc/video/jjdance&func=single&vid=3441112&o=time_d&p=9+

View the move and if you know what it is please let me know.

By the way it is NOT what I was attempting. Jonathan's description cleared the air for me and Serendipidy gave me more information which I found really usefull, particularly A Wing after an Open Impetus.

Thankyou all for your input.

Kind Regards
John Brennan
Re: Waltz: Whisk to Wing
Posted by Serendipidy
3/9/2008  6:33:00 PM
More on the Wing. I was told leave that one out of your routine unless you enjoy being run over. This is in a competition with a dozen people on the floor. When you think about it, you have found a position on the floor where you have space around you. Then you vertually stay on the same spot for two bars of music. Not a good idea.Leave that one for your medals along with anything simular.
Re: Waltz: Whisk to Wing
Posted by johnbrennan
3/9/2008  8:09:00 PM
Serendipidy, I totally agree in competition, yes you may get run over, but away from competition, I enjoy the wing because of its gracefullness.

If one word comes to mind when WALTZ is mentioned, I would say the word GRACEFULL.

For me the Waltz is a gracefull piece of art, and I can express this by executing the WING.

However, thankyou for the advice.

What would be an appropriate anti static (progressing) movement after the WING?

Kind Regards
John Brennan
Re: Waltz: Whisk to Wing
Posted by Waltz123
3/9/2008  8:39:00 PM
I checked the video clip you posted. If you were referring to the action following the Whisk they took at the corner, it's not a Wing. I would call it a Syncopated Telemark from Promenade Position, or Quick Closed Telemark.

Conceptually it's very similar to the idea of a Quick Open Reverse -- not the syllabus version, but the version people actually do in competition, either from promenade or outside partner position starting with man's right foot forward. A Quick Open Reverse is simply an Open Reverse Turn with an extra step at the beginning. The extra step in this case is a step through in promenade position, with the lady then turning around the man to return to closed position, to follow with the rest of the Open Reverse.

Along the same lines, you can do a "quick" anything that normally starts with the man's left foot forward into a reverse turning action, such as a "Quick Closed/Chasse Reverse", a "Quick Viennese Cross", a "Quick Open Telemark", or a "Quick Closed Telemark". The latter is the pattern you see on the video following the Whisk.

Regards,
Jonathan
Re: Waltz: Whisk to Wing
Posted by johnbrennan
3/10/2008  1:25:00 AM
Thanks Jonathan. I had no idea what that action was called. I shall take note of your description.

Kind Regards
John Brennan
Re: Waltz: Whisk to Wing
Posted by dheun
3/10/2008  7:51:00 AM
I did watch the video as well and I appreciate Jonathan's description of that action. Now that I have seen it on video, it is the closed position aspect of it that makes more sense and is easier to visualize now. When the original question was posted, I was trying to visualize some type of quick turn by the lady off of the Whisk and, still in promenade hold and still in LOD. But the explanation of the Quick Closed Telemark makes sense. Plus, again, I know what to call it now.
That video, by the way, is a good one.
Re: Waltz: Whisk to Wing
Posted by Serendipidy
3/10/2008  4:14:00 PM
Isn't it nice and refreshing to see moves given their correct names for a change. After the Wing I do a Syncopated Chasse to the right followed by a Outside Change finishing in Promenade.
After the Chasse to the right why don't we call the remainder a Reverse Weave. Because we have started what would be the last three of a Weave and haven't done the Weave in its entirety . We might call it a Weave ending, but that wouldn't be technically correct would it.
Re: Waltz: Whisk to Wing
Posted by johnbrennan
3/10/2008  7:30:00 PM
Serendipidy, regarding your comment on calling moves their correct names, I wholeheartedly agree. However, doubling up in your description of the move is not altogether a bad thing. The more descriptive you can be, the easier it is for the reader to visualise. For example, Jonathan's description of that move in the video.

What do you think?

Kind Regards
John Brennan

+ View More Messages

Copyright  ©  1997-2024 BallroomDancers.com